There are several obvious meanings that rely upon the context in which the word manipulation is applied. In this case it applies to the historical temperature data sets that purport to provide evidence for man-made ‘global warming’ or axiomatic ‘climate change’.

The first set of temperature data that comes from the New Zealand Crown Enterprise, The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA). The actual temperature record shows a gradual decline in temperatures since around 1850 to the present day. The published temperature record shows the opposite, a gradual warming trend. This is achieved by ‘manipulating’ the data in unknown and unstated ways. This manipulation has caused concern in the scientific community and a call for transparency. The well identified climate bias of the NZ media ensured a brief report through gritted teeth for one day.  As I mentioned in my previous blog, I have written to the NZ Minister of Climate (Dr Nick Smith) whose secretary advises me that he is aware of the issue and will respond in the new year. Astonishing. Dr Smith has a PhD in the sciences and is well capable of understanding the scientific issues at stake here. At the very least, this data manipulation needs to be fully disclosed immediately to quell any suggestion that might arise around scientific integrity.

The second set of temperature data that I want to highlight is referred to on the Science and Public Policy Institute web site and applies to Brisbane airport between 1950 and 2008. Once again, the manipulated data is graphed and published (GISS), showing a warming trend over the period. However, graphing of the actual data reveals instead, the opposite – a cooling trend. It turns out that the manipulated data is adjusted downward pre-1978 and upward, post-1978 to produce a overall upward gradient and an appearance of  ‘warming’. The reason for adjustment is not stated and is completely inconsistent with good scientific practice, once again raising potential issues of integrity.

Create a problem (anthropogenic driven climate change) and provide the political solution (Kyoto, Copenhagen, Save the World et al.) is the exercise of a timeless and well worn practice by which influence and control are brought to bear on a wider populous. As distasteful as it may seem, it would appear that some echoes of bygone eras, Germany 1930, may still be heard. The ’solution’ of Copenhagen is little more than a grandstanding political rally of the faithful but the implications are considerably more serious for impoverished countries, for wider sovereignty, for freedom and for the global and local economies. Those that seek to raise scientific evidence to the contrary, struggle to be heard. The scorn and ridicule of ad hominem attacks are the usual currency of defense by the faithful. And their fanaticism grows more strident and worrying -   see the eye witness blog on the SPPI web site ‘Hitler Youth in Denmark again’ Dec 11th  by Christopher Monckton.

Many scientists other than IPCC atmospheric modelers, suggest that the planetary climate cycle is commencing a cooling period and that we may eventually see winters of the 1600 – 1700’s where the River Thames froze over completely. There may be an irony in this and it would be that those of the warming consensus would eventually claim that their insight and action had led to the cooling.